Skip to main content

Premium Project

Specialty Referral Delay Audit

Audit whether specialty referrals are made, acknowledged, reviewed, documented and escalated within locally agreed timeframes, and whether delays affect patient flow, diagnosis, treatment or safety.

PremiumNew
Explore Catalogue

Overview

This project audits the quality, timeliness and reliability of specialty referral processes. It reviews whether referrals are made through the correct route with sufficient clinical information, are acknowledged and acted on, and whether delay contributes to diagnostic delay, treatment delay, prolonged length of stay, unsafe handover or missed escalation.

Specialties, services & categories

Clinical specialties:Acute MedicineEmergency MedicineGeneral Internal MedicineGeriatric MedicineFrailtySurgeryOrthopaedicsCardiologyRespiratory MedicineGastroenterologyNeurologyRenal MedicineOncology and HaematologyLiaison PsychiatryPalliative CareRadiology and Diagnostics
Healthcare services:Clinical GovernanceNursing & AHPsPharmacy
Categories:Patient Flow & Operational ImprovementPatient SafetyGovernance

Who should use it

  • Acute medicine, emergency medicine and general internal medicine teams
  • Specialty and on-call review teams, including surgical, medical and liaison specialties
  • Ward leaders, nurses, ACPs and physician associates
  • Site, patient-flow and clinical operations teams
  • QI leads, governance teams and educators

Objectives

  • Measure documentation of referral indication, specialty, urgency and route
  • Assess acknowledgement, specialty review and timeliness against locally agreed timeframes
  • Assess escalation, ongoing clinical ownership and handover where referrals remain outstanding
  • Identify variation by clinical area / location, optional specialty / service and referred specialty
  • Generate governance-ready and ARCP-ready evidence

Data collected

  • Anonymous case identifier
  • Inclusion / eligibility decision
  • Anonymised biodata (age band, recorded sex/gender, care setting, assessment context)
  • Clinical area / location and optional specialty / service
  • Sixteen specialty referral delay criteria (met / not met / not applicable)
  • Free-text learning points and any project custom fields

Outputs generated

  • Live dashboard
  • Audit report (Word)
  • Executive summary (Word)
  • Excel workbook
  • PowerPoint presentation
  • Conference poster
  • ARCP evidence summary

Standards and guidance

This ready-built project is developed using the guidance, standards and authoritative sources listed below, so you can see what is being measured and why. Lazomis QI does not publish or own this guidance, and inclusion here does not imply endorsement or approval by any of these organisations.

Governance notes

  • Designed to use anonymised or pseudonymised audit identifiers.
  • This tool supports, but does not replace, clinical judgement.
  • Local policy, formulary and specialist advice should be followed.
  • Organisations remain responsible for local governance arrangements.
  • This tool supports, but does not replace, clinical judgement. Follow local policy, referral pathways and specialist advice.
  • Use anonymous case identifiers only — never patient-identifiable information.

Lazomis QI supporting resources