Skip to main content

Premium Project

Safeguarding Documentation Audit

Audit whether safeguarding concerns are recognised, described, escalated, referred, communicated and followed up with clear ownership and outcome.

PremiumNew
Explore Catalogue

Overview

This project audits whether safeguarding documentation is clear, timely, proportionate and actionable. It reviews whether concerns are recognised and described, whether immediate risk and safety actions are recorded, whether the adult or child pathway is identified according to local policy, whether consent, capacity and best-interests considerations are documented, whether advice, referral, route and timing are recorded, and whether communication, handover, incident reporting, follow-up and outcome are documented in the agreed location.

Specialties, services & categories

Clinical specialties:Acute MedicineEmergency MedicineGeneral Internal MedicineGeriatric MedicinePsychiatryPaediatricsObstetrics and GynaecologyPrimary CareNursingAllied Health Professionals
Healthcare services:Clinical GovernanceNursing & AHPsPatient Safety
Categories:GovernancePatient Safety

Who should use it

  • Doctors, nurses, ACPs and allied health professionals
  • Safeguarding leads, named professionals and liaison teams
  • Care-home, community, hospice and GP practice clinical leads
  • Mental health, learning disability and rehabilitation teams
  • QI leads, governance and patient safety teams, supervisors and educators

Objectives

  • Measure whether safeguarding concerns are recognised and documented clearly
  • Assess consent, mental capacity and best-interests documentation where information is shared
  • Review escalation, referral route, timing and named ownership
  • Test communication, interagency contact, handover and follow-up reliability
  • Generate governance-ready and ARCP-ready evidence and a re-audit cycle

Data collected

  • Anonymous case identifier
  • Inclusion / eligibility decision
  • Anonymised context (age band, sex/gender recorded, care setting, safeguarding context)
  • Clinical area / location and optional specialty / service
  • Twenty-one safeguarding documentation criteria (met / not met / not applicable)
  • Free-text learning points and any project custom fields

Outputs generated

  • Live dashboard
  • Audit report (Word)
  • Executive summary (Word)
  • Excel workbook
  • PowerPoint presentation
  • Conference poster
  • ARCP evidence summary

Standards and guidance

This ready-built project is developed using the guidance, standards and authoritative sources listed below, so you can see what is being measured and why. Lazomis QI does not publish or own this guidance, and inclusion here does not imply endorsement or approval by any of these organisations.

Governance notes

  • Designed to use anonymised or pseudonymised audit identifiers.
  • This tool supports, but does not replace, clinical judgement.
  • Local policy, formulary and specialist advice should be followed.
  • Organisations remain responsible for local governance arrangements.
  • This tool supports documentation review only. It does not replace safeguarding advice, local safeguarding policy, specialist safeguarding teams, statutory duties, emergency escalation or clinical judgement.
  • Referral thresholds, referral routes, named teams, forms and out-of-hours arrangements are locally configured and are not presented here as national standards.
  • Use anonymous case identifiers only — never patient-identifiable information, and never identifiable detail about family members, alleged perpetrators or staff.

Lazomis QI supporting resources