Skip to main content

Premium Project

NEWS2 Escalation Audit

Audit whether NEWS2 observations, scoring, clinical concern and escalation actions are documented and acted on in line with local deterioration policy.

PremiumNew
Explore Catalogue

Overview

This project audits whether adult patients with physiological deterioration are identified, scored, escalated, reviewed and reassessed reliably. It reviews observation completeness, NEWS2 scoring and accuracy, oxygen scale and target saturation documentation, new confusion, documented clinical concern, monitoring frequency, escalation action and recipient, structured communication, response and senior review, sepsis consideration, treatment escalation context, reassessment, ongoing plan, handover, transfer decisions and documented rationale where escalation differed from local policy.

Specialties, services & categories

Clinical specialties:Acute MedicineEmergency MedicineGeneral Internal MedicineGeriatric Medicine / FrailtyRespiratory MedicineCardiologyRenal MedicineStroke / NeurologyOncology / HaematologySurgeryTrauma and OrthopaedicsCritical Care / OutreachNursingAllied Health ProfessionalsClinical Governance
Healthcare services:Nursing & AHPsClinical GovernancePatient Safety
Categories:Patient Safety

Who should use it

  • Doctors, nurses, ACPs and PAs working with deteriorating adults
  • Critical care outreach, hospital-at-night, site and sepsis teams
  • Acute medicine, emergency department, ward and frailty teams
  • QI leads, governance and patient safety teams
  • Supervisors and educators supporting ARCP and appraisal evidence

Objectives

  • Measure observation completeness and NEWS2 scoring reliability
  • Assess escalation triggers, escalation actions and structured communication
  • Review response timeliness, senior review and sepsis consideration
  • Test reassessment, ongoing monitoring plans, handover and transfer documentation
  • Generate governance-ready and ARCP-ready evidence and a re-audit cycle

Data collected

  • Anonymous case identifier
  • Inclusion / eligibility decision
  • Anonymised context (age band, sex/gender recorded, care setting, escalation context, NEWS2 risk category)
  • Clinical area / location and optional specialty / service
  • Twenty-four NEWS2 escalation criteria (met / not met / not applicable)
  • Free-text learning points and any project custom fields

Outputs generated

  • Live dashboard
  • Audit report (Word)
  • Executive summary (Word)
  • Excel workbook
  • PowerPoint presentation
  • Conference poster
  • ARCP evidence summary

Standards and guidance

This ready-built project is developed using the guidance, standards and authoritative sources listed below, so you can see what is being measured and why. Lazomis QI does not publish or own this guidance, and inclusion here does not imply endorsement or approval by any of these organisations.

Governance notes

  • Designed to use anonymised or pseudonymised audit identifiers.
  • This tool supports, but does not replace, clinical judgement.
  • Local policy, formulary and specialist advice should be followed.
  • Organisations remain responsible for local governance arrangements.
  • This tool supports documentation and escalation-process quality assurance only. It does not provide patient-specific emergency management, diagnosis, sepsis treatment, oxygen prescribing or escalation decisions.
  • Escalation response times, observation frequencies, single-parameter trigger rules, critical care outreach criteria, sepsis bundle triggers and oxygen-scale exceptions are locally configured and are not presented here as national standards.
  • NEWS2 is intended for adults. Do not apply it to paediatric, maternity or neonatal populations.
  • Use anonymous case identifiers only — never patient-identifiable information, and never identifiable detail about patients, families or staff.

Lazomis QI supporting resources